ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models in Paediatric Dentistry: A Scoping Review.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of generative artificial intelligence in chronic pain: a scoping review.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs), a type of artificial intelligence (AI), have been applied to various fields of dentistry in recent years. Although several reviews have examined AI applications in paediatric dentistry, most have focused on diagnostic assistance, and none have comprehensively addressed LLM use, including not only dental professionals but also patients or their guardians. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched in September 2025 using the terms "Pediatric dentistry" AND "ChatGPT" OR "Gemini" OR "Claude" OR "Copilot" OR "DeepSeek." Of the 262 articles identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review-24 published in 2025 and 6 in 2024. The largest group of studies (18 articles) focused on "answers to questions," followed by 8 on "diagnostic assistance" and 3 on "dental examination." LLMs demonstrated promising potential in paediatric dentistry across a range of users, including dental students, professionals, patients, and guardians. However, because LLMs can still provide inaccurate or misleading information, they should currently be used only as a supplementary tool. Recognizing these limitations and applying LLMs appropriately is essential. Continued research may further expand the scope and reliability of LLM applications in paediatric dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.