ArticleBlood advances2026
Mapping diagnostic practices in hemoglobinopathies: a cross-country HELIOS COST Action study.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hemoglobinopathy diagnostics: the HELIOS Action survey.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractHemoglobinopathies comprise the most common monogenic diseases worldwide. In Europe, formerly low-prevalence regions have seen increasing numbers of carriers and patients, with important public health implications. Implementation of policies and laboratory methodologies varies across countries, affecting equitable care. This study aimed to provide a snapshot of current screening and diagnostic practices and to identify gaps and priorities. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from May to October 2024 across the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action Haemoglobinopathies in European Liaison of Medicine and Science network participants. The survey, including 21 questions, covered hematological methods, molecular diagnostics, and laboratory practices and policies. Responses were provided directly by centers and summarized descriptively in tables and maps. Responses were received from 38 centers in 20 countries. Hematology remains the diagnostic backbone for hemoglobinopathies, DNA-based testing is widely adopted although advanced genomics are limited, newborn screening is implemented widely for sickle cell disease and thalassemia, carrier reporting practices vary, and genetic modifier testing is emerging. The findings highlight opportunities for cross-country collaboration and targeted capacity building, identifying centers that could benefit from shared expertise and resources. These findings can guide strategies to harmonize protocols, strengthen diagnostic capabilities, and support broader implementation of best practices across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.