SynthesisBlood advances2026
Pediatric-inspired regimens and HSCT for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prioritized health outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood neoplasia · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe best frontline treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is unclear. To support a clinical practice guideline, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence on (1) asparaginase-based (pediatric) vs non-asparaginase-based (adult) regimens and (2) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vs no HSCT for AYAs (aged 15-39 years) with ALL in first complete remission. Data sources were PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from inception to 29 November 2023. Eligible studies compared regimens or the use of HSCT and reported survival, remission, toxicity, or quality of life in AYAs. We included 19 studies (14 comparative, 5 single-group; N = 3607) comparing regimens and 7 studies (N = 7492) comparing HSCT and no HSCT. Studies were mostly of poor quality, with sparse randomized controlled trials (RCTs), yielding low-certainty findings. Pediatric regimens were associated with higher 5-year overall survival (OS; relative risk [RR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.65), event-free survival (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.85), disease-free survival (DFS; RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.82), and lower treatment-related mortality (TRM; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.90). HSCT was associated with lower 5-year OS (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84) and DFS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.90) and higher nonrelapse mortality (RR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.18-6.18) and TRM (hazard ratio, 6.88; 95% CI, 3.02-15.70). Relapse risk varied by time point. In AYAs with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL, pediatric regimens may improve survival; toxicity-related evidence remains limited. HSCT may lead to inferior OS and DFS. With a dearth of RCTs, low-certainty evidence highlights the need for high-quality studies and subanalyses of AYAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.