ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Venous Thromboembolism in Women with Breast and Gynaecological Cancers: What Do We Know and What Should We Do?
Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Risk factors and clinical strategies for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis following breast cancer surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncology. Female-specific cancers-including breast, ovarian, endometrial, and cervical malignancies-demonstrate distinct thrombotic profiles influenced by hormonal mechanisms, anatomical features, and treatment strategies. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological evidence, mechanistic pathways, and clinical trial data to characterize CAT risk across these cancer types. Key modulators of thrombosis include hormonal exposures, tumor histology, inflammatory signaling, tissue factor expression, and therapeutic interventions such as surgery, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy. Despite growing understanding, current CAT risk prediction models insufficiently reflect the heterogeneity of female cancers and fail to integrate bleeding risks specific to gynecologic disease and treatment. Optimizing CAT prevention and management will require improved risk stratification tools, individualized thromboprophylaxis strategies, and incorporation of survivorship considerations, including fertility and contraception counseling. A multidisciplinary approach involving oncology, gynecology, and thrombosis specialists is essential to reduce the burden of CAT and improve outcomes for women with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.