Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41610177›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Discrimination performance in illness-death models with interval-censored disease data.

Marta Spreafico, Anja J Rueten-Budde, Hein Putter, Marta Fiocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marta SpreaficoMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7773-9976
Anja J Rueten-BuddeMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Hein PutterMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5395-1422
Marta FioccoMathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical studies, the illness-death model is often used to describe disease progression. A subject starts disease-free, may develop the disease and then die, or die directly. In clinical practice, disease can only be diagnosed at pre-specified follow-up visits, so the exact time of disease onset is often unknown, resulting in interval-censored data. This study examines the impact of ignoring this interval-censored nature of disease data on the discrimination performance of illness-death models, focusing on the time-specific area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in both incident/dynamic and cumulative/dynamic definitions. A simulation study with data simulated from Weibull transition hazards and disease state censored at regular intervals is conducted. Estimates are derived using different methods: the Cox model with a time-dependent binary disease marker, which ignores interval-censoring, and the illness-death model for interval-censored data estimated with three implementations-the piecewise-constant model from the

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputer SimulationDisease ProgressionHumansProportional Hazards ModelsROC CurveSarcomaAUCdiscriminationillness-death modelinterval-censoringtime-dependent disease marker

Identifiers

PMID41610177
PMCPMC13047238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.