Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41610107›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

The epidemiology of ceftriaxone and cotrimoxazole-resistant Escherichia coli from humans, poultry, and their environment in central Malawi: A cross-sectional study.

Ronald Chitatanga, Michael Luwe, Chikhulupiliro Yiwombe, Williams Mwantoma, Harry Milala, Catherine Kamwana, Stella Mazeri, Tiziana Lembo, Adrian Muwonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronald ChitatangaAntimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Center, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-1721
Michael LuweEdinburgh Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2953-8371
Chikhulupiliro YiwombeAntimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Center, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Williams MwantomaEdinburgh Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Harry MilalaAntimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Center, Public Health Institute of Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Catherine KamwanaEdinburgh Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Stella MazeriEdinburgh Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tiziana LemboSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Adrian MuwongeEdinburgh Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry represents an important reservoir for clinical antibiotic resistance, especially in low- and middle-income-countries where food security pressures drive intensified farming and antibiotic use. However, evidence linking poultry production to public health risks remains limited in settings such as Malawi. This study examined Escherichia coli resistance to ceftriaxone and cotrimoxazole, two antibiotics with distinct stewardship priorities. We conducted a cross-sectional study between July and September 2022 in Malawi's Central region, targeting poultry farms. Our mixed-methods design combined microbiological sampling from farm workers, poultry, and effluent water with a structured questionnaire on antibiotic use. E. coli isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion for ceftriaxone and cotrimoxazole. 376 poultry farms were enrolled and among these, 17.6% reported using Trimovet, a veterinary formulation containing the same active ingredients as cotrimoxazole. Antibiotic use was more common among farms using commercial feed (aOR = 6.97; 95% CI: 3.43-14.17), and among farm workers with prior antibiotic knowledge (aOR = 5.56; 95% CI: 3.01-10.25). From 1,432 E. coli isolates recovered across all sources, resistance to cotrimoxazole was high: 80% in humans, 75% in environmental specimens, and 64% in poultry. In contrast, ceftriaxone resistance remained comparatively low (7.9%, 12%, and 7.3%, respectively). Predictors of cotrimoxazole resistance included farms in Nkhotakota district (aOR = 3.26; 95% CI: 1.84-6.01), fully housed chickens (aOR = 2.60; 95% CI: 1.67-4.08), commercial feed use (aOR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.09-2.18), and prior antibiotic use (aOR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.19-2.35). These findings highlight the risk that commercial poultry farming systems pose to public health, particularly for cotrimoxazole, which remains a cornerstone of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) prophylaxis and community care in Malawi. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship across both human and animal sectors is urgently needed to mitigate transmission at the human-animal-environment interface.

Identifiers

PMID41610107
PMCPMC12854471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.