ArticleACR open rheumatology2026
Self-Assessment Triage for Inflammatory Arthritis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrompt referral to a rheumatologist is essential for the prevention of joint damage in people with inflammatory arthritis (IA). We investigated whether rheumatology referrals can improve triage if additional information from two self-assessment tools, namely the tender joint count (TJC) and the Early Inflammatory Arthritis Detection Tool (EIADT), was included with the referral letter.
methodsNewly referred patients with no history of IA were recruited from two rheumatology practices. All patients were randomly allocated within a 2 × 2 factorial design to one of the following four groups: (1) no self-assessment, (2) TJC + EIADT, (3) TJC, and (4) EIADT. Participants were blinded to group allocation. Primary outcome was urgency rating, which was either 0 to 4 weeks, 4 to 6 weeks, 6 to 12 weeks, or nonurgent (>12 weeks). For each patient, an urgency rating was assigned to each of the following: (1) referral letter, (2) referral letter plus self-assessment, and (3) clinical assessment.
resultsTwo hundred two patients were recruited and allocated across the four groups. Compared to referral letter alone, adding self-assessment to the referral letter significantly increased the number of participants marked nonurgent in the EIADT group (P < 0.05, McNemar-Bowker test), but not in any of the other groups. Also, in the EIADT group, clinical assessment did not significantly increase the number of nonurgent ratings compared to referral letter plus self-assessment (P ≥ 0.05, McNemar-Bowker test).
conclusionIncluding the EIADT with the referral letter may improve triage for new referrals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.