ReviewTargeted oncology2026
Current and Emerging Treatment Landscape of Common EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in Targeted oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been standard of care as monotherapy for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer since reporting of the FLAURA phase III clinical trial, which demonstrated superiority over first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Efforts to improve efficacy have led to combination therapies with chemotherapy or co-inhibition of EGFR and MET, which have become additional standards. Choosing between these strategies requires careful understanding of disease biology and disease burden, and joint decision making with patients. Despite increasing understanding of acquired resistance mechanisms in later-line therapies, advances in the first-line options have made second-line treatment decision making increasingly nuanced. Physicians require an in-depth understanding of the genomics of the disease, and ideally an ability to reassess the tumour genomic/expression profile to guide next-line therapy at each timepoint of progression. Targeting on-target resistance (e.g. C797X mutations) with fourth-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been disappointing, and in addition to biological challenges, there are regulatory challenges with approaches combining tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR and off-target oncogenic resistance kinases. There are multiple broader approaches to improve second
Indexed as
Identifiers
41609978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.