ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2026
Family Perspectives on Pediatric Complementary and Integrative Medicine Practices in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology.
Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFamilies of children with cancer and nonmalignant blood disorders frequently explore complementary medicine (CM). Despite growing evidence supporting CM for pediatric populations, physician communication about its use remains limited. This study evaluates caregiver awareness, interest, and use of CM among pediatric hematology/oncology patients.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among caregivers at the University of North Carolina Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Clinic (May-September 2024). Eligible participants spoke English or Spanish and had attended at least one clinic visit. The survey assessed awareness and use of CM, including nutrition, supplements, mind-body practices (e.g., prayer, acupuncture, and yoga), and whole medical systems (e.g., traditional Chinese and Ayurvedic medicines)-as well as costs, motivations, and barriers.
resultsA total of 150 caregivers completed the survey. Only 30% of respondents were familiar with CM terminology, yet 58% reported using at least one CM form. Dietary modifications were most common (47%), followed by mind-body practices (20%). Caregivers of cancer patients prioritized CM to reduce treatment side effects, whereas caregivers for those of patients with nonmalignant hematology conditions prioritized long-term quality-of-life. Barriers included lack of awareness (61%) and cost (15%). Only 17% had discussed CM or PIM (pediatric integrative medicine) with clinicians, and in most cases (60%), caregivers initiated the conversation.
conclusionsFindings highlight significant gaps in awareness, access, and clinician-family communication regarding pediatric CM. Despite limitations such as single-site design and modest sample size, results underscore the need for caregiver education and accessible services to better support pediatric patients and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.