Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41609926›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Peripheral intravenous waveform analysis for evaluating volume status in healthy volunteers and mechanically ventilated patients.

Aura Koistinaho, Sole Lindvåg Lie, Svein Aslak Landsverk, Harald Lenz, Marius Rehn, Jonny Hisdal, Lars Øivind Høiseth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aura KoistinahoInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. aura.koistinaho@gmail.com.
Sole Lindvåg LieDepartment of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Oslo, Norway.
Svein Aslak LandsverkDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Harald LenzDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marius RehnInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jonny HisdalInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Øivind HøisethDivision of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely diagnosis of blood loss and evaluation of intravascular volume status are pivotal tasks in clinical practice. Recent studies in animals and during lower body negative pressure (LBNP) in humans indicate that peripheral intravenous pressure waveform analysis (PIVA) may detect early stages of blood loss. As PIVA only requires a peripheral venous cannula, it may have value in emergency settings. However, its clinical relevance remains uncertain. This study examined how volume changes affect the PIVA-derived fundamental frequency (PIVAF1). Two cohorts were studied. The LBNP cohort comprised 15 healthy volunteers exposed to simulated blood loss in 10 mmHg increments of LBNP every two minutes from 0 to 80 mmHg, or until hemodynamic decompensation. The general anesthesia (GA)-cohort included 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who underwent preload increase with a head-down tilt. Peripheral intravenous pressure waveforms were continuously recorded from an antecubital vein and analyzed using short-time Fourier transform to extract the amplitude at the heart-rate frequency (PIVAF1). Changes in PIVAF1 were analyzed using linear regression. In the LBNP-cohort, data were log(e) – transformed and associated with a change per LBNP level of -0.11 (95% CI -0.14 to -0.09, P < 0.001). In the GA-cohort, PIVAF1 did not reliably predict a 10% change in stroke volume with head-down tilt [AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.11)]. We found statistically significant reductions in PIVAF1 during simulated blood loss but PIVAF1 did not predict increasing stroke volume during head-down tilt in general anesthesia. The clinical significance of PIVA remains to be elucidated.

Indexed as

Blood VolumeRespiration, ArtificialAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleFourier AnalysisHead-Down TiltHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansHypovolemiaLaparoscopyHemodynamicsHypovolemiaLower body negative pressureVenous pressure

Identifiers

PMID41609926
PMCPMC13194292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.