SynthesisWorld journal of urology2026
Using intravesical botulinum toxin as an adjunct during urologic surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Minimally Invasive Therapies for Men with Overactive Bladder.Current urology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntravesical onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) has been studied as a curative therapy for overactive bladder (OAB), neurogenic bladder, and interstitial cystitis. Limited evidence supports adjunctive BTX-A during urologic surgeries to reduce bladder spasms and improve outcomes. This study examines the role of adjunctive BTX-A at the time of urologic surgery.
methodsA literature search of four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) was performed for studies describing adjunctive BTX-A during urologic surgery and its impact primarily on quality of life and urinary outcomes. Studies investigating BTX-A as a curative therapy or in the post-operative setting were excluded.
resultsLiterature search identified 2175 studies. Thirteen studies were included. Three studies investigated BTX-A at the time of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. All studies found that combination therapy led to improved patient-reported continence scores. Seven studies investigated BTX-A at the time of mid-urethral sling to treat urgency incontinence (UI) in patients with mixed incontinence. Five of seven studies found that combination therapy led to improved OAB and UI symptom scores. Two studies explored BTX-A at the time of bladder reconstruction and found that BTX-A reduced postoperative pain and improved lower urinary tract symptoms. One study found that pre-operative BTX-A use before vesicovaginal fistula repair reduced bladder spasms. No studies found a significantly increased risk of urinary retention with adjunctive BTX-A.
conclusionInitial evidence supports the use of BTX-A at the time of urologic surgeries to decrease bladder spasms and improve post-operative pain and continence without increasing the risk of urinary retention. Further study is required to understand its optimal role and indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41609877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.