Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41609867›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Voluntariness of requests for assisted suicide].

Esther Braun, Tanja Henking, Christin Hempeler, Jan Schildmann, Jakov Gather

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esther BraunJuniorprofessur für Medizinische Ethik mit Schwerpunkt auf Digitalisierung, Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften Brandenburg, Universität Potsdam, Am Mühlberg 9, 14476, Potsdam, Deutschland. esther.braun@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-7752
Tanja HenkingInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0595-1940
Christin HempelerInstitut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8532-3284
Jan SchildmannInstitut für Geschichte und Ethik der Medizin, MLU Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5755-7630
Jakov GatherInstitut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-7472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntariness refers to the freedom of a decision from undue influence or pressure. It is one component of an autonomous decision for assisted suicide and, therefore, an important factor to consider when assessing requests for assisted suicide. This article examines which factors can potentially impact the voluntariness of such requests.Based on the medical ethics literature and empirical studies from related contexts, relatives, individuals providing suicide assistance, and healthcare workers are identified, among others, as key actors who may be relevant in decisions about assisted suicide. Possible forms of interpersonal influence include threats, offers, interpersonal leverage, and persuasion. In addition, structural constraints-such as socioeconomic hardship-can potentially influence voluntariness. When assessing whether requests for assisted suicide are autonomous, the potential presence of such factors should be systematically examined.Given the limited availability of empirical data to date, there is an urgent need for further research in this area. This is also essential for the development of guidelines for assessing the voluntariness of requests for assisted suicide.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPersonal AutonomySuicide, AssistedGermanyHumansAutonomyEthicsInformed consentPressureUndue influence

Identifiers

PMID41609867
PMCPMC12957012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.