Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41609770›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

MRI to guide clinical management of rectal cancer: updated consensus recommendations from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)-PART I primary staging.

ESGAR Rectal Imaging Guideline Group

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MRI-based perfusion-diffusion habitat analysis for characterizing intratumoral heterogeneity in rectal adenocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

ESGAR Rectal Imaging Guideline Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide up-to-date consensus recommendations on the acquisition, interpretation and reporting of MRI for the primary staging of rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA panel of twenty-six abdominal imaging experts from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) engaged in an online consensus process, led by three non-voting chairs. The process adhered to an adapted version of the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method. A total of 126 items were scored (22 general, 55 on primary staging, 49 on restaging after neoadjuvant treatment) and classified using ≥ 80% as the cut-off to establish consensus.

resultsConsensus was reached for 121 items (96%). The current manuscript addresses the resulting general recommendations and those focused on baseline staging. Key updates compared to the previous guideline editions include more detailed recommendations for image acquisition, adoption of the sigmoid take-off as a landmark to discern rectal from sigmoid cancer, updated definition of mesorectal fascia involvement by a distance of ≤ 1 mm, including involvement by irregular nodes and extramural vascular invasion; a transition to a patient-level approach for cN-category assessment with updated criteria for lateral nodes including a ≥ 7 mm size threshold, and recommendations on the limited use of DWI for primary staging.

conclusionsThese updated expert consensus recommendations serve as clinical guidelines for the primary staging of rectal cancer using MRI. Recommendations for restaging and response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment are addressed in a separate publication. KEY POINTS: Question Since the last ESGAR rectal imaging guideline update, the rectal cancer treatment landscape has further evolved, necessitating updates to the existing guidelines. Findings An online consensus process involving 26 panellists led to 96% consensus across 121 items discussed, including 22 general items and 55 related to primary staging. Clinical relevance Key updates related to primary staging include more detailed recommendations for image acquisition, adoption of the sigmoid take-off, refined criteria for MRF involvement, a new patient-level approach for cN-assessment, and recommendations on the limited use of DWI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsEuropeHumansNeoplasm StagingSocieties, MedicalClinical guidelinesMagnetic resonance imagingPrimary stagingRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41609770
PMCPMC13212678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.