ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Automated deep learning for detection and measurement of adrenal masses in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdrenal tumors can be functional or malignant, yet they are often overlooked in abdominal CT. This study aimed to develop and validate a fully automated deep learning model for adrenal mass detection and measurement in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 415 CT scans with (n = 155) and without (n = 260) adrenal masses for model development (median age, 40 years; 206 men). Adrenal gland masks were automatically generated using a pretrained segmentation model, and adrenal mass masks were manually refined to train a U-Net-based segmentation network. Two secondary test sets were used for validating mass detection (external test set, n = 995) and size measurement (internal test set 2, n = 50). The external test set reflects a real-world incidence of adrenal masses (4.8%) as determined by radiologic evaluation without pathologic confirmation. The model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for adrenal mass detection and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for adrenal mass measurement.
resultsIn the internal test set 1 (n = 42), the AUC for classifying adrenal mass was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.0), with an average Dice score of 0.812. The model achieved an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.96) with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of 89.6%, 96.9%, 96.6%, and 59.7% (95% CI: 77.3-96.5%, 95.6-97.9%, 95.3-97.5%, and 50.6-68.2%, respectively), respectively, in the external test set. The model identified 44 of 50 adrenal masses in internal test 2. The ICCs of the predicted diameter were 0.848 (95% CI: 0.723-0.917) and 0.855 (95% CI: 0.735-0.921) for the CT-measured and pathologically measured diameters, respectively.
conclusionThe proposed deep learning model accurately detected and measured adrenal masses in abdominal CT. The model has the potential to improve detection rates of adrenal lesions and facilitate their early management. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed deep learning model can detect adrenal masses often missed by radiologists and accurately estimate their size, potentially improving patient management in screening, follow-up, and preoperative settings. KEY POINTS: Adrenal masses, which may be functional or malignant, are frequently missed on abdominal CT, leading to delays in appropriate management. A deep learning model can accurately detect the adrenal masses (accuracy 96.6%) and predict the size similar to the sizes measured in CT and surgical specimens (ICC 0.848-0.855). The proposed DL algorithm may help clinicians in various clinical settings, including screening, follow-up, and preoperative evaluation of adrenal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41609765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.