ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Validation of the revised definition of lupus low disease activity in patients with SLE.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Revisiting lupus low disease activity: validation matters, but vindication is imperative.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEULAR recently updated its recommendation for managing SLE by redefining the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) with a reduced allowable glucocorticoid dose of ≤5 mg. No studies have validated this revised definition. Thus, we aimed to evaluate its association with clinical outcomes, including organ damage, disease flares and quality of life.
methodsA total of 299 SLE patients were enrolled and conducted annual follow-ups over 4 years. Disease flares were assessed based on changes from previous visits. Disease activity was measured using the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Irreversible organ damage was evaluated using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36, with a focus on the Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) scores. Longitudinal analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations models to compare the revised and existing LLDAS definitions.
resultsThe revised LLDAS definition was significantly associated with reduced organ damage (SLICC/ACR SDI, β = -2.922; 95% CI: -3.294 to -2.550; P < 0.001), lower disease flare risk (odds ratio = 0.207; 95% CI: 0.083-0.515; P < 0.001) and improved mental health (SF-36 MCS, β = 1.219; 95% CI: 0.114-2.323; P = 0.031), showing comparable effectiveness to the existing definition.
conclusionThe revised LLDAS definition demonstrated comparable clinical benefits, supporting its adoption in clinical practice for improved long-term SLE management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41609430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.