ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Advances in scCUT&Tag and computational analysis for single-cell gene regulatory element mapping.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic pacemaker: A review of DNA methylation, histone lactylation, and non-coding RNAs in autoimmune skin diseases.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Natural Plant Bioactives as Regulators of Histone Modifications: Bridging Epigenetics and Anticancer Therapy.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histone modifications (HMs) and transcription factors (TFs) are central to chromatin dynamics and transcriptional regulation. Conventional bulk approaches like ChIP-seq require large cell populations, limiting applicability to heterogeneous studies and tissue samples. In contrast, single-cell cleavage under targets and tagmentation (scCUT&Tag) and its variants have enabled high-resolution profiling of HMs and TFs for investigating gene regulatory mechanisms in individual cells, transformatively broadening single-cell epigenomics beyond chromatin accessibility measured by scATAC-seq. Despite rapid advances in scCUT&Tag-related methods and the accumulation of ~21 public datasets, a systematic overview of the current research status, especially the forefront of computational analysis and ensuing challenges, remains lacking. Here, we comprehensively overview current scCUT&Tag studies from a bioinformatics perspective. We catalog representative applications spanning diverse chromatin features, experimental designs, and data characteristics. We delineate a typical computational workflow from matrix generation to downstream functional annotations, emphasizing distinctions from scATAC-seq analysis, and highlighting critical analytical considerations. We extensively survey commonly used computational tools and key algorithms, compare analytical features between scCUT&Tag and scATAC-seq, and discuss major challenges in integrative analysis. This work provides a structured reference for understanding the current research landscape of scCUT&Tag and offers computational perspectives for researchers aiming to explore gene regulatory machinery at single-cell resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.