ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Validation of aerial photogrammetry methods to measure body size, condition and mass in small cetaceans.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate morphometric measurements are essential for estimating body size and condition in animals. These characteristics are, in turn, key to eco-physiological studies, wildlife management and conservation. For free-ranging cetaceans, however, collecting non-invasive morphometric data is challenging. Unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry offers a promising solution but requires ground-truthing to assess accuracy and precision. Similarly, morphometric-based indices of body condition must be validated against the animals' true body condition. Here we validated UAV-derived estimates of body size and condition in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) under human care by comparing photogrammetry-based measurements of body length, width, height and girth from both stationary and swimming individuals with manual measurements. The two methods showed negligible differences, with UAV-based data yielding lower variability, confirming both high measurement accuracy and precision. Using UAV-derived measurements we calculated a volume-based body condition index (BCI) and compared it with a mass-based BCI, a standard metric in ecological research. The two indices showed a near-perfect fit, demonstrating that volume-based metrics reliably reflect true body condition in small cetaceans. Body density decreased with increasing body condition, consistent with higher fat-to-muscle ratios. By combining UAV-derived body volume with predicted density, based on their body condition, we accurately estimated individual body mass (mean error = 6.4%). This study provides a comprehensive validation of UAV-based photogrammetry to estimate body size, condition and mass in small cetaceans, highlighting its value as a non-invasive and cost-effective tool for ecological and conservation research. KEY POINTS: Measuring body size and condition in free-ranging dolphins is difficult, yet essential to understand their physiology, energy reserves and health. We used unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAV) to obtain accurate, non-invasive body measurements of bottlenose dolphins and compared them with direct manual measurements. UAV-based photogrammetry produced highly precise and accurate estimates of body length, girth and overall body volume, even for freely swimming animals. A UAV-derived, volume-based body condition index matched traditional mass-based indices and enabled accurate estimation of body mass. These results validate UAV photogrammetry as a reliable, ethical and cost-effective method for assessing body size, condition and mass in small cetaceans, thereby advancing ecological and physiological research in the wild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.