Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41609292›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

PelviSound L-Real-time intraoperative sonographic assessment of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes using a drop-in probe in endometrial and cervical cancer during minimally invasive surgery: A single-center pilot feasibility study in 20 patients.

Sascha Hoffmann, Laura Trif, Bernhard Krämer, Felix Neis, Diethelm Wallwiener, Sara Y Brucker, Markus Hoopmann, Markus Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sascha HoffmannDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-5464
Laura TrifDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard KrämerDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Felix NeisDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Diethelm WallwienerDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus HoopmannDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Markus HahnDepartment of Women's Health, University Women's Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is considered an essential step in the surgical management of endometrial and cervical cancers as it has led to a reduction in the need for full pelvic lymphadenectomy. This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of intraoperative sonographic assessment of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) during laparoscopic and robotic surgeries for endometrial and cervical cancers.

methodsThis was a prospective, single-center, non-interventional diagnostic feasibility study conducted between October 2023 and July 2024 at the University Women's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany, and registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00032919). A total of 20 patients underwent intraoperative sonographic SLN evaluation using a sterile drop-in ultrasound probe prior to resection. The assessment was based on the Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) criteria that includes parameters, such as lymph node shape, cortical thickening, vascularization, and echogenicity. Findings were correlated with histopathologic results to determine diagnostic accuracy. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the sonographic criteria, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted, focusing on sensitivity and specificity with respect to lesion dignity classification (benign vs malignant).

resultsAmong the 25 initially prepped patients, 20 successfully underwent intraoperative sonographic SLN evaluation, while five were excluded due to logistical issues or consent withdrawal. A total of 49 SLNs were analyzed, and the analysis included histopathologic confirmation. The sonographic assessment demonstrated perfect sensitivity and specificity of 1.0 as reflected by the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 1.0). No adverse events were reported.

conclusionThe study confirms that intraoperative sonographic evaluation of SLNs in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgeries is feasible, safe, and highly accurate. This technique may serve as a valuable adjunct to current SLNB protocols and lead to a potential reduction in the need for extensive lymphadenectomy while concurrently maintaining diagnostic reliability. Further research using larger cohorts is warranted to validate these findings and assess broader clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPelvisPilot Projectsgynecologic cancerimage‐guided surgeryintraoperative ultrasonographyminimally invasive surgical proceduresentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41609292
PMCPMC13278656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.