ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Analysis of Closed Claims in Cardiovascular Medicine: Importance of Nonclinical Factors.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical professional liability claims are a marker of conflict between a patient and a health care provider.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the contributing factors (CFs) associated with medical professional liability claims.
methodsA total of 764 cardiovascular-related closed claims with 1,945 CFs were identified from a large insurer (The Doctor's Company) from 2010 to 2023.
resultsThree clinical CFs: technical performance (329; 43% of claims), patient assessment (242; 32%), and management/selection of therapy (216; 28%) were the most frequently cited CFs. Patient factors, mainly due to nonadherence to medications or instructions, were identified in 171 claims (22%). Nonclinical CFs (987) were more frequent than clinical CFs (787) and patient factors (patient: 171). Nonclinical CFs were very diverse but the most frequent were communication between providers and patient (20%), communication among providers (16%), insufficient documentation (11%), and off-shift/weekend hours (10%). Payment was less common in claims with technical performance or patient factor CFs and more common in claims with patient assessment, selection/management of therapy, and in the 4 most frequent nonclinical CFs. Nonclinical CFs were more commonly observed in claims with payment (1.1/claim) when compared to claims without (0.64/claim). No differences among the different cardiovascular subspecialties were identified. Closed claims were identified in 3% of covered cardiovascular providers over the last reliable portion of the study period.
conclusionsClinical and nonclinical CFs are equally important for malpractice claims. While focusing on clinical quality is important, implementing strategies that also account for nonclinical issues, with a particular focus on communication, documentation, and off-shift/weekend coverage could have significant benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.