ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Pain Relief of Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Real-World Analysis.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Pain Relief of Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Real-World Analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpinal metastases may cause pain, neurological compromise, paraplegia, and limb movement disorders; their management requires a comprehensive approach. Alongside systemic anti-tumor therapies, focal interventions such as radiotherapy, bone-modifying agents, and surgery are crucial for slowing disease progression and managing pain in spinal metastases. However, substantial variations exist in radiotherapy regimens for spinal metastases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) regimens at our hospital, specifically to evaluate pain relief and incidence of re-irradiation after HFRT.
methodsIn this retrospective study, data from 58 patients diagnosed with spinal metastasis who received HFRT (4.5-10Gy * 3-7F) at our center between December 2017 and June 2022 were analyzed. All patients were followed up from the initiation of HFRT to either death or their last follow-up visit. Degree of pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) before and after 1 month of HFRT. A multivariate Cox regression model was established to identify the independent risk factors for prognostic analysis of spinal metastasis.
resultsHFRT could effectively manage pain in patients with spinal metastasis. The pain scores were significantly decreased after HFRT (3.43 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001), with 84.5% patients experiencing improved pain relief 1 month after radiotherapy. No cases of radiation myelitis were observed during the follow-up period. Furthermore, the incidence of re-radiotherapy was significantly increased in patients with spinal metastases who received moderate HFRT (< 5 Gy/day) (p = 0.01, HR = 0.43).
conclusionHFRT significantly reduced pain scores and reirradiation rates without increasing radiation myelitis incidence for spinal metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.