Trial reportEuropean journal of sport science2026
Low-Versus High-Carbohydrate Isocaloric Diets on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Healthy Trained Cyclists: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
Trial report in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Versus High-Carbohydrate Isocaloric Diets on Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Healthy Trained Cyclists: A Randomized Crossover Trial.European journal of sport science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized crossover trial examined the effects of low-carbohydrate high-fat (LCHF) versus high-carbohydrate low-fat (HCLF) isocaloric diets on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived glucose metrics in trained, healthy male cyclists. Participants (n = 15) followed each dietary condition for 7 days, with glucose data continuously collected using CGM technology. The primary outcomes assessed were mean glucose levels, glucose variability, and time spent within specific glycemic ranges across wake, exercise, and nighttime phases. Results indicated that the LCHF diet significantly reduced mean glucose levels and glycemic variability (CV) compared to the HCLF diet. Mean glucose values were significantly higher during exercise compared to wake and night phases, irrespective of dietary conditions. Exercise intensity was positively associated with higher glucose concentrations during training sessions, independent of dietary conditions. Furthermore, nocturnal glycemia was significantly lower after exercise days, suggesting an influence of prior physical activity on overnight glucose regulation. Substantial interindividual variability in glucose responses was observed, highlighting the necessity of personalized dietary strategies for athletes. This study demonstrates that dietary carbohydrate manipulation significantly influences glucose metabolism, with implications for optimizing training, recovery, and metabolic health in endurance athletes. Future research should further explore individualized glucose responses and longer-term adaptations to dietary interventions in athletic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.