ReviewRevista de neurologia2026
[XVII Post-ECTRIMS Meeting: Review of the New Developments Presented at the 2024 ECTRIMS Congress (I)].
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe XVII edition of the post-European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) meeting was held on 4-5 October 2024 in Madrid. This event was attended by Spanish neurologists specialized in multiple sclerosis (MS), who presented a summary of the most relevant advances discussed at the ECTRIMS congress, held days before in Copenhagen.
aimTo present new developments in neurodegeneration and progression, the prodromal phase and diagnosis, the clinical use of biomarkers and neuroimaging, as well as the current role of patient-reported outcomes and digital monitoring. Highlights on the risk of infections and comorbidities in MS are also summarized. Content and Conclusions: In active MS lesions, there is no correlation between the myeloid cell phenotype and remyelination, while memory astrocytes, regulated by the CLEC16A gene, are present in chronic active lesions. Gray matter atrophy is associated with disability and progression independent of relapses, whereas cervical spinal cord atrophy predicts the prognosis of progressive forms and may lead to earlier diagnosis. Healthcare resource utilization increases in the years preceding the first demyelinating event, and although prodromal symptoms are highly variable, they are useful in identifying risk factors for the disease. The new McDonald criteria will facilitate the diagnosis of MS in patients with a radiologically isolated syndrome. Glial fibrillary acidic protein complements neurofilaments, and both biomarkers could soon be standardized for use in clinical practice; paramagnetic rim lesions and slowly expanding lesions are promising imaging markers. In another area, patient-reported health outcomes are valuable, although they are subject to selection bias and the need to define boundaries for their use. Finally, the risk of infections increases before diagnosis and may worsen with certain treatments. Comorbidities in MS should be managed as an integral part of disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.