ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Predicting protein-carbohydrate binding sites: a deep learning approach integrating protein language model embeddings and structural features.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Augmented Multi-Omics for Abiotic Stress Responses: A New Frontier in Plant Hormone Systems Biology.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-carbohydrate interactions play an important role in many biological processes and functions, like inflammation, signal transduction, and cell adhesion. In our work, we will study non-covalent carbohydrate binding sites. In this paper, we aim to build a deep-learning model to predict non-covalent protein-carbohydrate binding sites. We were motivated by the fact that experimental approaches for predicting these sites are expensive. So, computational tools are necessary for identifying these interactions. We explored several sequence-based features as well as structural features. We also leveraged protein language model embeddings. We analyzed different architectures and selected the most suitable deep learning architecture for our finalized prediction model, DeepCPBSite. DeepCPBSite is an ensemble model that combines three separate models with three approaches (random undersampling, weighted oversampling, and class-weighted loss) built on the ResNet+FNN architecture. We made separate datasets from three sources: RCSB, UniProt, and CASP. We also compared the structural features extracted from the structures predicted by AlphaFold and ESMFold in the context of our prediction tasks. We employed three different feature selection techniques and finally did a SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis on the structural features after categorizing the proteins based on their organism information. DeepCPBSite achieved 78.7% balanced accuracy and 59.6% sensitivity on the TS53 set, outperforming the second-best competitor, DeepGlycanSite, by 1.16% and 2.94%, respectively. Additionally, its F1, MCC, and AUPR scores outperformed other state-of-the-art methods, with improvements ranging from 3.77%-47.6%, 3.84%-32.7%, and 8.18%-60.21%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.