Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608973›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational health2026

COVID-19 vaccination status and motivators among Canadian health care workers: are they different from the general population?

Camille Léger, Vincent Gosselin Boucher, Frédérique Deslauriers, Samir Gupta, Maximilien Vakambi Dialufuma, Michael Vallis, Simon L Bacon, Kim L Lavoie, iCARE Study team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camille LégerDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Vincent Gosselin BoucherDepartment of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Frédérique DeslauriersDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Samir GuptaUnity Health Toronto, Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada.
Maximilien Vakambi DialufumaMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
Michael VallisFamily Medicine, Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-5936
Simon L BaconMontreal Behavioural Medicine Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Ile-de-Montréal (CIUSSS-NIM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
Kim L LavoieDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2606-1357
iCARE Study team

Funding

Canada Research Chairs Program 950-232 522CIHR FBD-203340CIHR MM1-174903CIHR MS3-173099CIHR PJT-479128CIHR SMC-151518CRSH 2025-01247Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé 251618Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé 34 757Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture 2019-SE1- 252541FRQS BF2 - 332 012Ministère de l'Économie et de l'Innovation du Québec 2020-2022-COVID-19-Ministère de l'Économie et de l'Innovation du Québec PSOv2a-51 754University of Toronto Michael Locke Term Chair in Knowledge Translation and Rare Lung Disease Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Canadian health care workers (HCWs) and identify motivators for COVID-19 vaccination, compared with the general population (GPop).

methodsAs part of the iCARE study, 4 cross-sectional age-, sex-, and province-weighted population-based samples of 12 009 Canadians aged 18+ years were recruited between May 2021 and February 2022. Participants self-reported HCW and vaccine status.

resultsA total of 738 participants identified as HCWs, with 8.5% being vaccine hesitant, versus 12.6% of the GPop (P = .005). In multivariate analyses, those with a chronic disease were less likely (HCW odds ratio [OR] = 0.34; GPop OR = 0.77) and parents with children <18 years of age in the household were more likely (HCW OR = 2.29; GPop OR = 1.39) to be vaccine hesitant. Needing only a single-dose vaccine (86%; 82.6%), and vaccine safety (46%; 42%) and effectiveness (38%; 37%) were most likely to motivate hesitant HCWs and GPop to get vaccinated.

conclusionsOur findings highlight less vaccine hesitancy in HCWs compared with the GPop, despite demographic and motivator correlates being similar. In terms of policy implications, shared interventions emphasizing vaccine safety, reduced illness severity, shorter disease duration, and the advantages of single-dose options may benefit all groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelMotivationVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCanadian health care workersCovid-19 vaccinationmotivators

Identifiers

PMID41608973
PMCPMC13089536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.