Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608750›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Larger-volume capillary blood sampling is a valid alternative to assess progesterone and 17ß-estradiol for cycle phase identification in tactical female athletes.

Jennifer Schlie, Eva Fellinger, Sina Albrecht, Jessica Güldenstern, Annette Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer Schlie *Institute for Sports Science, Chair of Sports Biology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.
Eva Fellinger *Institute for Sports Science, Chair of Sports Biology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.
Sina AlbrechtInstitute for Sports Science, Chair of Sports Biology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.
Jessica GüldensternInstitute for Sports Science, Chair of Sports Biology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.
Annette SchmidtInstitute for Sports Science, Chair of Sports Biology, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Serum-based hormone analysis is considered essential for determining menstrual cycle phases in sport and exercise science. However, its reliance on venous blood sampling limits applicability in field-based or operational contexts. This study evaluated the validity of larger-volume capillary samples obtained from the earlobe for the quantification of progesterone (P4) and 17ß-estradiol (E2) in comparison to venous blood sampling. Materials and method: Twelve eumenorrheic female soldiers (mean age: 24.4 ± 2.9 years; BMI: 24.4 ± 2.2 kg/m Results: All participants completed six or more sampling timepoints and had ovulatory cycles, with a mean cycle length of 28.3 ± 3.6 days and ovulation occurring on day 16.6 ± 4.7. On average, P4 concentrations were 1.6 ng/mL higher in venous compared to capillary samples, while E2 values were 0.34 pg/mL lower. The concordance correlation coefficients were 0.911 for P4 and 0.919 for E2, indicating good to very good agreement between the sampling methods. Repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis with mixed effects revealed minimal mean bias for both hormones, with acceptable limits of agreement. Repeated measures correlation coefficients were 0.915 and 0.982 for E2 and P4, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: The results demonstrate that earlobe-derived capillary sampling is a valid and practical alternative to venous sampling for hormonal assessment across the menstrual cycle. The method yielded robust results for both P4 and E2, with sufficient accuracy to support cycle phase classification and the detection of anovulatory or luteal-phase deficient cycles. The logistical advantages include minimal invasiveness, no need for medical personnel, and the ability to analyze the frozen samples at a later date. This makes capillary sampling particularly well suited for use with athletes and tactical populations. Future studies should explore its application in elite athletes and incorporate participant-reported burden to optimize feasibility in high-frequency sampling protocols.

Indexed as

cycle phase verificationELISAestrogenfemale physiologyfemale sex hormonesfollicular phaseluteal phase

Identifiers

PMID41608750
PMCPMC12834711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.