Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608738›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Hemolysis correction factor in the reporting of serum neuron-specific enolase - Clinical utility in neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest.

Christina Jungar, Erik Alinder, Charlotte Becker, Marion Moseby-Knappe, Anna Lybeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Early multimodal predictors of good neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective single-center cohort study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina JungarDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, University and Regional Laboratories, Region Skåne, Sweden.
Erik AlinderDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, University and Regional Laboratories, Region Skåne, Sweden.
Charlotte BeckerDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, University and Regional Laboratories, Region Skåne, Sweden.
Marion Moseby-KnappeDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology and Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anna LybeckDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) from 48 h after cardiac arrest is the only biomarker of brain injury with recommended cut-offs for use in neuroprognostication. Hemolysis elevates levels of NSE and may result in false outcome predictions. Methods: A correction-factor for hemolysis in reporting of levels of NSE was established and evaluated in (1) incoming routine samples and (2) biobank samples from 48 h after cardiac arrest from the SweCrit biobank. Comparisons were made with three methods for handling hemolysis: Hemolysis Index (HI) 30 mg/dL or HI 50 mg/dL as the highest acceptable level of hemolysis, or a graded approach. Results: Five-hundred and fifty-six routine samples and 263 biobank samples were analyzed. A correction factor of 0.33 µg/L per HI significantly increased the number of reported routine samples, when compared to the three other methods for handling hemolysis (HI 30 mg/dL or HI 50 mg/dL as the highest acceptable level of hemolysis, or a graded approach). Use of the correction factor did not affect the number of reported biobank samples. The prognostic accuracy of NSE was unaffected by use of the correction factor compared to the other tested methods for handling hemolysis: area under the curve (AUC) 0.88 (95 % Cl 0.84-0.92) vs 0.87 (95 % Cl 0.83-0.92) at HI ≤ 30 mg/dL, 0.87 (95 % Cl 0.83-0.92) at HI ≤ 50 mg/dL and 0.87 (95 % CI 0.83-0.92) with the graded approach. Levels of hemolysis were low in the biobank samples. Conclusion: Due to the low levels of hemolysis in the biobank samples, the effects of a correction factor on neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest in routine samples remains uncertain. Clinical use of a correction factor may lead to more reported samples but risks over-correction.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiac arrestHemolysisNeuron specific enolaseNeuroprognostication

Identifiers

PMID41608738
PMCPMC12835405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.