Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608736›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Performing chest compressions during the initial phase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: continuous vs. alternating (CALM) - a study protocol for prospective, randomised, monocentric, non-blinded, mannequin study with German emergency medical service personnel.

Hans Thomas Hölzer, Nikolai Kaltschmidt, Levi Kohal, Johann Bechtold, Lisa Kaltschmidt, Marita Klein, Stefan Mohr, Christopher Neuhaus, Markus A Weigand, Frank Weilbacher and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hans Thomas HölzerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nikolai KaltschmidtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Levi KohalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johann BechtoldDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lisa KaltschmidtDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marita KleinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan MohrDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christopher NeuhausDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank WeilbacherDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Erik PoppDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephan KatzenschlagerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Effective chest compressions are a core element of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current guidelines recommend exchanging the person performing chest compressions every two minutes to ensure high-quality chest compressions. However, this can lead to several task interruptions, which could result in a prolonged delay until other relevant tasks, such as securing the airway or administering adrenaline, are completed. Some studies have shown that a rescuer can perform sufficient CPR continuously for more than five minutes. Therefore, this study will investigate whether chest compressions without staff changes in the initial phase of CPR result in fewer task interruptions and an earlier completion of relevant tasks. Methods and analysis: To investigate this, a prospective, randomised, monocentric, non-blinded, mannequin study will be conducted. The 32 teams will perform CPR in two simulated settings. Each team consists of four members, according to the German emergency service standard. Before entering the scenario, they will be randomised to either CPR with or without staff changes or either a shockable or non-shockable rhythm. The scenario ends with the fourth rhythm analysis. After a 20-min break, they will enter the second scenario. Teams will be informed whether they should perform continuous or alternating CPR but will not know which rhythm they have been assigned to. The primary outcome will be the time it takes to complete all relevant tasks during the initial CPR phase. Secondary outcomes include chest compression quality, task load, and number of interrupted tasks. Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (S-252/2025, June 04, 2025). It is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00037157, June 10, 2025). Participation will be voluntary and based on informed consent. Data will be recorded only in a pseudonymised form. After completion, data will be kept on file for 10 years. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed academic journal. De-identified data from the case report form will be made publicly available within the first publication. The study will be conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant laws.

Indexed as

Advanced life supportCardiopulmonary resuscitationChest compressionEmergency medical serviceOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestSimulation

Identifiers

PMID41608736
PMCPMC12835407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.