ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Innovations in Thrombectomy Training: A Systematic Review and Expert Recommendations from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology-Mission Thrombectomy Initiative.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulation and Virtual Reality as Training Modalities in Interventional Radiology: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical thrombectomy is a critical intervention for patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. However, significant barriers remain in its widespread implementation, particularly in low- to middle-income countries, including a shortage of trained physicians and limited access to advanced medical technologies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate current mechanical thrombectomy training methodologies and assess their effectiveness in improving procedural skills among neurointerventional teams.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eight studies were included, with 3 studies eligible for meta-analysis. We assessed training approaches, participant demographics, and procedural outcomes using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool and performed statistical analysis using OpenMetaAnalyst software.
resultsVarious training modalities, including virtual reality simulations and hands-on workshops, consistently demonstrated positive effects on procedural skills and professional confidence, demonstrating significant improvements across multiple metrics. Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed statistically significant reductions in total procedure time (average decrease of 17.84 minutes, 95% CI: [-22.19 to -13.48]), number of handling errors (decreased by 6.34 errors, 95% CI: [-13.16 to 0.48]), contrast volume (decreased by 27.35 mL, 95% CI: [-45.11 to -9.60]), and fluoroscopy time (reduced by 8.07 minutes, 95% CI: [-10.71 to -5.44]). Participants showed increased procedural steps completed, with an average increase of 6.52 steps (95% CI: [3.99-9.05]).
conclusionStructured, simulation-based mechanical thrombectomy training programs can significantly enhance procedural skills, clinical decision-making, and professional confidence among neurointerventional teams, potentially improving stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.