ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Estimation of Acute Infarct Core and Hypoperfused Region from Baseline Noncontrast Computed Tomography and Computed Tomography Angiography Scans of Patients with Ischemic Stroke.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn acute ischemic stroke, the infarct core and hypoperfused regions are key indicators for assessing and prognosticating patients. They are typically estimated with computed tomography perfusion (CTP). However, because noncontrast CT and CT angiography are more widely available, we trained a neural network to estimate the ischemic lesion from noncontrast CT and CT angiography scans.
methodsIn this retrospective study, an nnU-Net model was trained to estimate infarcted and hypoperfused regions from noncontrast CT and CT angiography using reference standards from a commercial CTP software (StrokeViewer). We included data from 859 patients for training and 137 for testing. We used data from the Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium, including MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands)-NO-IV, MR CLEAN-MED, MR CLEAN-LATE, and MR CLEAN-Registry, and a local cohort. In addition to testing our model against StrokeViewer, we also compared our results with 3 other commercial CTP software packages.
resultsOur model achieves a Dice of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.39-0.50) for core and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.69) for hypoperfused region, underestimating core volume by -9.3 mL (95% CI, -12.5 to -6.1) and hypoperfused region volume by -12.9 mL (95% CI, -21.1 to -4.7) compared with StrokeViewer. When comparing the 4 CTP software packages together, the average of their 2-by-2 agreement ranges from a Dice of 0.22 to 0.28 for core, and a Dice of 0.50 to 0.56 for hypoperfused region. This is similar to the average agreement of nnU-Net with these 4 software packages (average Dice 0.27 for core and 0.56 for hypoperfused). Furthermore, nnU-Net produces fewer connected components (1.3 for core, 1.6 for hypoperfused) than the average of the 4 CTP software packages (60.8 for core and 110.8 and hypoperfused), indicating more cohesive segmentations.
conclusionOur model's performance in segmenting infarct core and hypoperfused regions from noncontrast CT and CT angiography is comparable to commercial CTP software packages, with potentially fewer segmentation artifacts. It can therefore be used when CTP is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.