ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility of Simplified Protocol in Resource-Limited Settings.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06016348 (Predictors of Good Outcomes in Thrombectomy for Stroke Patients Within 24 Hours From Symptom Onset With Large Infarct Core), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predictors of Good Outcomes in Thrombectomy for Stroke Patients Within 24 Hours From Symptom Onset With Large Infarct Core
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral trials have demonstrated the benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large-core strokes (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score <6). However, its effectiveness in lower-middle-income countries with resource-limited settings remains uncertain. This study evaluated the feasibility of EVT for large-core strokes using a simplified imaging protocol with noncontrast CT and CT angiography in a resource-constrained environment.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study at Da Nang Hospital, Vietnam (May 2023-May 2024). Patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion strokes, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score <6 on noncontrast CT, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥6, and EVT within 24 hours were included. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days. Functional independence was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 and ambulatory independence as 0-3. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. Post-hoc indirect comparisons of ambulatory independence and mortality were made against the Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation EVT arm and the best medical treatment cohorts from 6 published "large core" randomized controlled trials.
resultsAmong 157 EVT-treated patients, 52 (33.1%) had Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score <6. Median age was 62.5 years, and 57.7% were male. Median onset-to-hospital time was 4.1 hours, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score15, and initial Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was 4. Successful reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction≥2b) was 78.9%. At 90 days, the median modified Rankin Scale score was 3.5. Functional and ambulatory independence were 23.1% and 50%, respectively. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 9.6%, mortality was 25%. Successful reperfusion was the only independent predictor of ambulatory independence (odds ratio [OR], 14.7; 95% CI, 1.6-134). Indirect comparisons showed higher ambulatory independence in our cohort compared with the Large Stroke Therapy Evaluation EVT arm (50.0% versus 33.5%,
conclusionsEVT is feasible for patients with large-core stroke in lower-income countries using a simplified noncontrast CT -CTA protocol. Successful reperfusion is a key determinant of improved outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This study is a substudy of the multicenter PROMISE (Predictors of Good Outcomes in Thrombectomy for Large Infarct Core Stroke Evaluation) cohort, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06016348, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06016348), using data from patients enrolled at Da Nang Hospital.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.