Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608709›Full record

ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Management of Intracranial Perforator Aneurysms.

Karthik Papisetty, Sam J Schulz, Rajiv Dharnipragada, Andrew S Venteicher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karthik PapisettyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN.
Sam J SchulzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5999-9138
Rajiv DharnipragadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN.
Andrew S VenteicherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0643-0493

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial perforator aneurysms are rare but potentially life-threatening vascular lesions that can lead to subarachnoid hemorrhage. Initial imaging is frequently negative, so a high level of suspicion is important for efficient detection of perforator aneurysms. The management of these lesions is challenging due to their location and delicate surrounding structures. Conservative management, endovascular treatment, and microsurgical clipping have been used to manage perforator aneurysms successfully. Because perforator aneurysms remain an underappreciated source of subarachnoid hemorrhage even when initial vascular imaging is negative, we aim to review this topic to raise awareness and the level of suspicion and provide an overview of treatment options for these challenging vascular lesions.

Indexed as

basilar perforator arteryintracranial aneurysmlenticulostriate arteryperforator aneurysmsubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID41608709
PMCPMC12697597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.