ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
From image to action: Evaluating the translation of coronary CT angiography findings into cardiovascular prevention in the emergency department.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is increasingly used in emergency departments (ED) for chest pain evaluation, but its role in directing preventive therapy at discharge remains unclear. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether CCTA findings were associated with statin initiation at discharge and to identify gaps in preventive care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing CCTA for chest pain in the ED of a large academic hospital. CCTA findings were categorized as no CAD, non-obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis), or obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis). The primary outcome was statin initiation at discharge among statin-naïve patients. Secondary outcomes included cardiology referral and heart disease education. We applied multivariable Firth logistic regression for the primary outcome and modified Poisson regression with robust variance for secondary outcomes. Results: Of 1410 participants (mean age=53.5 ± 10.9 years; 52.8% female), 723 (51.3%) had no CAD and 687 (48.7%) had CAD (69.3% non-obstructive, 30.7% obstructive). In statin-naïve patients ( Conclusions: CCTA findings strongly predict statin initiation at discharge, yet large treatment gaps persist, especially in non-obstructive CAD. Routine ED CCTA provides a missed but actionable opportunity to initiate guideline-based therapy and reduce ASCVD burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.