ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2026
Association between single, dual, poly use of tobacco products and smoking cessation in Korean adult smokers.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study examined the association between smoking cessation and different usage combinations of three tobacco products (combustible cigarette [CC], electronic cigarette [EC], heated tobacco product [HTP]) in Korean adults.
methodsWe analyzed repeated data from the Korea Health Panel Survey (KHPS), which consisted of nationally representative samples. A total of 1380 Korean adults participated in the study. The outcome of interest was whether the participant succeeded in quitting smoking all types of tobacco products. Participants were classified according to whether they smoked any of the three tobacco products (CCs and/or ECs and/or HTPs) based on their self-reported responses.
resultsA total of 211 participants had quit smoking during the follow-up period. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for smoking cessation was 3.15 (95% CI: 1.66-5.95), and 1.81 (95% CI: 0.63-5.21) for participants who currently smoke only HTPs (HTP-only user) and participants who currently vape only ECs (EC-only user), respectively, compared with participants who currently smoke only CCs (CC-only user). There was no significant association between dual or triple smoking and smoking cessation.
conclusionsHTP-only users had a statistically significant association with smoking cessation, with higher odds of quitting smoking within two years compared to CC-only users. Further studies with a large sample are required to validate our results considering a small number of participants in the comparison groups in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.