ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2026
Ocular health in outer space and beyond gravity: A minireview.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Omics Characterization of Human Molecular Responses to Spaceflight Across Two Independent Missions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolonged exposure to microgravity profoundly influences ocular physiology, giving rise to spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS), a significant concern for astronauts on long-duration missions. This review consolidates current evidence on ocular adaptations to spaceflight, encompassing pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic advances, related ocular conditions, and emerging countermeasures. Literature published between 2000 and 2025 was systematically examined across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, integrating both peer-reviewed studies and technical reports from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the European Space Agency. Findings indicate that ocular changes consistent with SANS affect approximately one-third of astronauts, with higher prevalence during missions exceeding six months. Hallmark features include optic disc edema, posterior globe flattening, and mild hyperopic shifts, attributed to cephalad fluid shifts, altered cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, venous congestion, and impaired glymphatic flow. Besides SANS, microgravity predisposes astronauts to dry eye disease, immune-related infections, and radiation-induced cataracts. Recent advances in in-flight optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, and ultrasound have enhanced early detection, while countermeasures such as lower body negative pressure, artificial gravity, and artificial intelligence-driven ocular monitoring show promise. Understanding ocular adaptations to space not only mitigates mission risks but also enriches terrestrial knowledge of intracranial pressure regulation and neuro-ophthalmic health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.