ReviewTheranostics2026
Nanomedicine in Organ Transplantation: From Graft Preservation and Repair to Immunomodulation and Monitoring.
Review in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of Hematologic Inflammatory Indices for Early Dialysis Requirement After Kidney Transplantation.Annals of transplantation · 2026Article
- The challenges and strategies for navigatingTheranostics · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Promise of Mitophagy in Cancer: Advancing from Small-Molecule Regulation to Nanotechnology-Enhanced Targeting Therapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Reversing Bladder Cancer Chemo-resistance through Blocking Cell Senescence by a Combination Therapy.Theranostics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organ transplantation remains a life-saving intervention for end-stage organ failure. However, its long-term success has been constrained by a few critical challenges, including few noninvasive diagnostic technologies for graft assessment, a lack of effective organ preservation and rewarming techniques to mitigate ischemic damage, the issue of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), the risk of immune-mediated rejection and the requirement of advanced postoperative management. Nanomedicine has been explored for overcoming these challenges for organ transplantation. A myriad of polymeric, inorganic and hybrid nanocarriers have been employed for nanomedicine. Targeting and stimuli-responsive nanomedicine has been developed to improve drug distribution and enhance its therapeutic/diagnostic efficacy. Nanomedicine has been applied for rewarming of large-sized organs, IRI mitigation, immunomodulation, and real-time monitoring. This review examines the mechanisms, elaborates design principles, and covers the application of nanomedicine in organ transplantation at stages of pre- to post-transplantation. The challenges in clinical translation of nanomedicine are discussed and future research directions are proposed. This review will provide a consolidated framework for the development and application of nanomedicine for organ transplantation, ultimately improving the quality of life of transplant recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.