Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608547›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026

Long-term prognostic impact of one-year change in left ventricular function after a myocardial infarction: insights from the REBUS cohort.

Joel Lenell, Christina Christersson, Bertil Lindahl, Jonas Oldgren, Frank A Flachskampf, Tomasz Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joel LenellDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7885-962X
Christina ChristerssonDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-8084
Bertil LindahlDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5795-0061
Jonas OldgrenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9969-3921
Frank A FlachskampfDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7401-278X
Tomasz BaronDepartment of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University, Sjukhusvägen 7, 753 09 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8290-557X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) management has changed in the last decades with the introduction of routine early invasive revascularization and potent antiplatelet therapy followed by an improvement in patient prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate if it remains of long-term prognostic value to repeat the assessment of systolic function, determining change in ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS), within a year after an MI. Methods and results: Patients hospitalized with acute MI ( Conclusion: Improved systolic function after MI did not add incremental long-term prognostic information beyond the baseline systolic function, however, a deterioration in GLS may be associated with worse long-term prognosis. Our results favor a clinical strategy of risk stratification based on GLS rather than LVEF to enhance clinical risk prediction.

Indexed as

global longitudinal strainleft ventricular ejection fractionoutcomeprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41608547
PMCPMC12835919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.