SynthesisInternational journal of community based nursing and midwifery2026
People Living with HIV Experiences from Peer Support: A Meta-Synthesis.
Synthesis in International journal of community based nursing and midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital health promotion strategies to increase HIV testing uptake among key populations: a scoping review.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peer support groups play a crucial role in enhancing the psychosocial well-being of people living with HIV (PLHIV), and understanding their experiences is essential for optimizing their impact. This review aimed to identify, explore, and synthesize the experiences of PLHIV participating in peer support groups. Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted using the thematic synthesis approach developed by Thomas and Harden. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science up to December 2024, using Boolean combinations of keywords related to HIV, peer support, and qualitative research. Studies were included if they used qualitative methods with a focus on PLHIV's experiences in peer support groups and published in English. Study quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist. The review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025637718). Results: Out of 1,956 records identified, 20 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies demonstrated substantial geographical diversity, with representation from Africa, North America, Asia, Europe, and Australia. The analysis revealed three main themes: (1) Motivations for Joining Peer Support Groups; (2) Positive Impacts; and (3) Challenges in Participation. Conclusion: Peer support groups help PLHIV gain motivation, emotional strength, and a sense of belonging. Despite these benefits, challenges such as stigma and confidentiality concerns must be addressed through sustainable programs and strong health-community partnerships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.