Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608524›Full record

ReviewNorth American Spine Society journal2026

Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: A systematic review of preclinical evidence, clinical translation, and future directions.

Vinicius Ricieri Ferraz, Carlos R Goulart, Maria Fernanda Ricieri Ferraz Franco de Souza, Marcelo Ochoa Coelho de Souza Furlan, Philippe Mercier, Tobias A Mattei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vinicius Ricieri FerrazChief Neurosurgeon of Spine Surgery, Dr. José de Carvalho Florence Hospital, Rua Saigiro Nakamura, 800 - Vila Industrial, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, 12220-280, Brazil.
Carlos R GoulartDivision of Neurological Surgery, Essentia Health, 502 E 2nd St, Duluth, 55805, MN, USA.
Maria Fernanda Ricieri Ferraz Franco de SouzaDivision of Neurology, Irmandade Da Santa casa de Misericórdia de Santos, Av. Dr. Cláudio Luiz da Costa, 50 - Jabaquara, Santos - SP, 11075-101, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Ochoa Coelho de Souza FurlanPontifical Catholic University of Paraná, School of Medicine, Rua Imaculada Conceição 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Philippe MercierDivision of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1008 S. Spring Avenue, 3rd Floor, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Tobias A MatteiDivision of Neurological Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1008 S. Spring Avenue, 3rd Floor, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a leading contributor to chronic low back pain and global disability. Existing therapies, from conservative management to spinal fusion, do not reverse the underlying molecular degeneration, leaving a critical treatment gap. Given its regenerative capabilities the advent of stem-cell therapy may constitute an ideal solution to fulfill such a therapeutic gap. Methods: This PRISMA-compliant systematic review evaluates stem cell-based strategies for intervertebral disc regeneration by examining preclinical evidence, clinical translation, and future directions. Searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and related databases (from January 2000-May 2025) identified studies reporting on pain (Visual Analogue Scale), function (Oswestry Disability Index), and structural outcomes (MRI). Results: Preclinical models uniformly demonstrate meaningful regeneration, including restoration of disc height and extracellular matrix. Clinical evidence, however, is limited: thirteen low to moderate-quality trials show modest, albeit statistically significant, improvements in pain and disability, without compelling imaging proof of biological repair. Short to mid-term safety appears acceptable. Conclusions: The use of stem-cell therapy for treatment of degenerative disc disease is constrained by the somewhat hostile and avascular microenvironment of the intervertebral disc. Existing trials exhibit significant methodological weaknesses which substantially impair their application to the daily clinical practice. Future progress will likely depend on incorporating biomaterial-assisted delivery systems, cell-free exosome approaches, biological scaffolds and gene-editing technologies aimed at engineering the disc niche rather than simply focusing on cell replacement.

Indexed as

Clinical trialDegenerative disc diseaseIntervertebral disc degenerationLow back painProgenitor cellsRegenerative medicineStem cellsStem cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID41608524
PMCPMC12835428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.