ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2026
Return to farming after orthopedic surgery: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere has been an increasing focus in recent years on health-care disparities. Studies investigating return to work (RTW) or sports are often performed in large, urban areas. Relatively few studies have investigated rates of return to farming or other heavy labor that is of interest to patients in rural areas.
aimTo evaluate the literature regarding RTW in farming or heavy labor after orthopedic hip, knee, or shoulder surgery.
methodsA search was performed in the PubMed and EMBASE databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they reported patients employed in farming or heavy labor, RTW rates after orthopedic surgery of the hip, knee, or shoulder, and had a minimum 6-month follow-up. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model was performed on three single-arm observational studies to estimate the pooled RTW rate following arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
resultsTen studies were included, and 101 farmers were identified among 440 total patients. One study involved hip surgery, two studies involved knee surgery, and seven studies involved shoulder surgery. RTW rates across studies varied by type of surgery and follow-up interval, ranging from 24% to 100%. The RTW rate was only 53.6% at 1 year following total hip arthroplasty. No studies investigated RTW in farmers following total knee arthroplasty. Among non-comparative studies, meta-analysis revealed a pooled RTW rate of 89% following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, with low heterogeneity (
conclusionThis systematic review highlights the high rates of RTW in farmers and heavy laborers after shoulder surgery. However, our findings also underscore the need for more rural-specific research to guide patient counseling, rehabilitation expectations, and shared decision-making in this underserved population, particularly for orthopedic surgery of the hip and knee.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.