ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical efficacy study of a spherical nasal vestibular stent.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To design and validate a spherical nasal vestibular stent based on vestibular structural changes for treating nasal obstruction. Methods: This study enrolled 99 patients with nasal obstruction and confirmed positive findings on anterior rhinoscopy. Pre- and post-dilation sinonasal computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained until symptoms nearly resolved. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was utilized to evaluate anatomical changes, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between these changes and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for nasal obstruction. Based on 3D reconstructed models and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) parameter evaluations, a nitinol mesh stent customized to the anatomical characteristics of the nasal vestibule was designed. A single-arm clinical trial in 31 patients was subsequently evaluated the stent using NOSE scores, acoustic rhinometry, and rhinomanometry before and after placement. Adverse events were systematically recorded. Results: 3D reconstruction showed that changes in nasal vestibule volume before and after dilation correlated with patients' VAS scores for nasal obstruction. In the clinical trial, the spherical nasal vestibular stent-designed using nasal vestibule volume data-significantly reduced nasal resistance ( Conclusion: Based on 3D models from dilated nasal vestibules, this study designed a spherical stent that effectively relieves nasal obstruction with minimal risk, positioning it as a promising non-surgical intervention for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.