Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608456›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Artificial intelligence for precision management of epithelial ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.

Qing Liu, Chunhua Zhang, Peiquan Li, Ruiyi Jing, Lei Bi, Weiping Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qing Liu *Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.
Chunhua Zhang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Peiquan LiFaculty of Chinese Medicine, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.
Ruiyi JingFaculty of Chinese Medicine, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.
Lei BiSchool of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Weiping ChenFaculty of Chinese Medicine, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has a high rate of incidence and mortality, seriously threatening women's health. Artificial intelligence (AI) possesses functions such as image recognition, data mining and pattern recognition, which can solve problems that traditional statistical methods cannot handle, such as large amounts of data and data missing. It has achieved breakthrough progress in the fields of risk prediction, diagnosis, treatment and response assessment of malignant tumors. Most AI technologies are mainly applied in the preoperative diagnosis of EOC, as well as in imaging and pathological genomics. However, their application in treatment and prognosis assessment studies is relatively limited. This article reviews the AI application in the treatment and prognosis assessment of EOC in recent years, including the establishment of prediction models for complete cytoreduction (R0 resection), the prediction of chemotherapy and targeted drug efficacy, and the application of different AI technologies based on pathology, radiomics, and clinical data for the prognosis assessment of EOC, with the aim of providing more ideas for the application of AI in EOC.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)multimodal data integrationprediction of prognosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID41608456
PMCPMC12836382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.