Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608455›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Inspiratory muscle training in weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francisca A Andrade-Rebolledo, Guillermo Villagra-Morales, Leonardo A Pérez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisca A Andrade-RebolledoEscuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Guillermo Villagra-MoralesEscuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile.
Leonardo A PérezEscuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Rehabilitación y Calidad de Vida, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients poses significant challenges, including increased morbidity and healthcare costs. Effective weaning strategies are critical to improving patient's outcomes, yet the optimal approach remains unclear. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has emerged as a potential adjunct therapy to facilitate weaning, addressing the gap in standardized interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effectiveness of IMT on weaning from mechanical ventilation in ICU patients. Seven randomized controlled trials published since 2019 were analyzed, comparing various IMT protocols. The findings support that high-intensity IMT can enhance extubation success rates and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, considerable variability in protocols and patient populations limits the generalizability of these findings. The findings underscore the urgent need for further research to standardize IMT protocols and to identify the patient subgroups most likely to benefit. Future studies should focus on refining methodologies and developing consensus-based guidelines to maximize the effectiveness of IMT in ICU settings. This review highlights the potential of IMT as a targeted strategy to improve weaning outcomes, reinforcing the importance of advancing evidence-based practices in critical care. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD420251070529.

Indexed as

inspiratory muscle trainingintensive care unitsprolonged mechanical ventilationrespiratory muscle trainingweaning

Identifiers

PMID41608455
PMCPMC12835378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.