Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608450›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Open- and closed-source LLMs in medical and engineering education.

Liping Sun, Ya Li, Hongxing Kan, Jianhua Shu, Huanqing Xu, Chengle Li, Guokun Shi, Ziyang Wang, Xueqi Wang, Li Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liping Sun *School of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ya Li *School of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hongxing KanSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jianhua ShuSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Huanqing XuSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Chengle LiSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Guokun ShiSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Ziyang WangSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xueqi WangSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Li JinSchool of Medical Informatics Engineering, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of large language models (LLMs), such as the close-source GPT-4, have revolutionized education in assisting students learning. However, open-source LLMs, which have many advantages of accessibility, customization, and transparency, remains under-utilized in both medical and engineering education. The work systematically evaluates the performance of open-source LLMs (DeepSeek, GLM-4, Kimi) and close-source GPT-4 in assisting medical and engineering students learning through diverse question types. We found that DeepSeek outperformed other models for all question types, achieving the highest accuracy rates. To further improve LLM-generated responses, prompt engineering strategies, such as role-playing, generated knowledge prompting, chain-of-thought prompting, few-shot prompting, and output style, were introduced. Post-training evaluations showed significant improvements in model accuracy, with DeepSeek exceeding 95% accuracy for all question types. Among them, Short-answer questions achieved the best response, with the accuracy rate reach up to 97% across four LLMs, indicating the important role of prompt engineering in problem-solving task. The findings highlight the potential of open-source models in supporting medical and engineering education, bridging a critical gap in open-source LLM evaluation and advocating for their wider integration into academic settings.

Indexed as

AIDeepSeeklarge language modelsmedical and engineering educationprompt engineering

Identifiers

PMID41608450
PMCPMC12834738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.