ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Open- and closed-source LLMs in medical and engineering education.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs), such as the close-source GPT-4, have revolutionized education in assisting students learning. However, open-source LLMs, which have many advantages of accessibility, customization, and transparency, remains under-utilized in both medical and engineering education. The work systematically evaluates the performance of open-source LLMs (DeepSeek, GLM-4, Kimi) and close-source GPT-4 in assisting medical and engineering students learning through diverse question types. We found that DeepSeek outperformed other models for all question types, achieving the highest accuracy rates. To further improve LLM-generated responses, prompt engineering strategies, such as role-playing, generated knowledge prompting, chain-of-thought prompting, few-shot prompting, and output style, were introduced. Post-training evaluations showed significant improvements in model accuracy, with DeepSeek exceeding 95% accuracy for all question types. Among them, Short-answer questions achieved the best response, with the accuracy rate reach up to 97% across four LLMs, indicating the important role of prompt engineering in problem-solving task. The findings highlight the potential of open-source models in supporting medical and engineering education, bridging a critical gap in open-source LLM evaluation and advocating for their wider integration into academic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.