ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Identification of co-segregating
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital cataract (CC), defined as lens opacity present at birth or in early infancy, is a major cause of reversible childhood blindness and shows marked genetic heterogeneity. This study aimed to investigate the genetic basis of CC in a multigenerational Chinese family. Methods: A four-generation family with CC was clinically characterized. Whole-exome sequencing was performed in the proband, followed by stepwise variant filtering based on minor allele frequency, predicted functional impact, known CC-associated genes, and an autosomal dominant inheritance model. Candidate variants were annotated and classified according to ACMG guidelines. Sanger sequencing was used to validate variants in two additional affected relatives. Results: Two heterozygous missense variants were identified in known CC-associated genes: Discussion: According to ACMG guidelines, both variants remain classified as variants of uncertain significance, but their rarity, predicted functional impact and consistent co-occurrence in affected individuals support them as strong candidate variants that may jointly contribute to CC in this family and expand the spectrum of GJA3- and CRYBA1-associated changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.