ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A radiomic model leveraging conventional and Hessian matrix-based radiomic features from DCE-MRI for predicting efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a predictive model for assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, integrating clinical factors and radiomic features. Method: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with HER2-low breast cancer who underwent NAC. Radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment imaging, including wavelet-based and Hessian matrix-based features. Various machine learning models were constructed using radiomic and clinicopathological features. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis was used to assess feature contributions. Model performance was evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and other metrics. Finally, a nomogram was established by combining the best-performing models to enhance predictive utility. Results: For the clinicopathological model, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm was determined as the most effective. In the radiomic model, which incorporated both conventional and Hessian matrix-based features, RF exhibited superior performance compared to other models, achieving an AUC of 0.84 in the training cohort and 0.74 in the validation cohort. Based on these findings, a nomogram was developed that integrated the best-performing RF models from both the clinicopathological and radiomic feature sets. This nomogram attained an AUC of 0.89 in the training cohort and 0.79 in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis further validated that the nomogram provided significant clinical benefits over models using only clinical or radiomic features. Conclusion: Our current study successfully constructed a predictive nomogram that offers a promising strategy for predicting NAC efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.