ArticleCase reports in medicine2026
Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: A Case Highlighting Diagnostic and Management Considerations.
Article in Case reports in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm: A Case Highlighting Diagnostic and Management Considerations.Case reports in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendiceal mucoceles (AMs) are rare pathological entities characterized by the accumulation of mucin within the appendiceal lumen. They may arise from either non-neoplastic or neoplastic processes, including low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs). Due to their variable clinical presentation and often incidental discovery, diagnosis can be challenging. We report the case of a 29-year-old female who presented with a 3-month history of constipation and intermittent abdominal pain. Physical examination revealed mild right lower quadrant tenderness without signs of peritonitis. Laboratory findings were unremarkable. Abdominal CT demonstrated a cystic, fluid-filled structure at the base of the appendix. Colonoscopy revealed a glossy, dome-shaped protrusion at the appendiceal orifice, consistent with a mucocele. The patient underwent an elective laparoscopic appendectomy. Histopathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of LAMN. Her postoperative course was uneventful, and she remained asymptomatic on follow-up. This case illustrates the diagnostic complexity of appendiceal mucoceles, particularly in young adults, where the condition is uncommon. The combination of cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic evaluation was pivotal in establishing the diagnosis. Early surgical management was crucial to prevent rupture and the potential development of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for AMs in patients with unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms and characteristic imaging findings. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention ensure favorable outcomes and prevent serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.