Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608362›Full record

ReviewCJC pediatric and congenital heart disease2025

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Transposition of the Great Arteries: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Jessica Victoria Yao, Ximena Cid-Serra, Karrar Albadosh, Andrew Browne, Anastasia D Egorova, Magalie Ladouceur, Craig Broberg, Muhammad A Nizam, Paul Khairy, Gareth J Padfield and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jessica Victoria YaoDepartment of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ximena Cid-SerraDepartment of Surgery, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Karrar AlbadoshDepartment of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Andrew BrowneNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anastasia D EgorovaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Magalie LadouceurDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Craig BrobergDepartment of Cardiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Muhammad A NizamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trinity Health Livonia Hospital, Livonia, Michigan, USA.
Paul KhairyElectrophysiology Service and Adult Congenital Centre, Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Gareth J PadfieldDepartment of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Jeremy P MooreUniversity of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, UCLA Health System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Geetha KandavelloPediatric and Congenital Heart Center, National Heart Institute (Institut Jantung Negara), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sushma ReddyDepartment of Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Gruschen VeldtmanDepartment of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Dominica ZentnerDepartment of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) due to transposition of the great arteries are known to have a particularly high risk of sudden cardiac death. Current guidelines issue a weak recommendation to consider primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with severe sRV dysfunction. This systematic review aims to ascertain factors that are associated with appropriate ICD therapy in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD, so that we can further refine selection criteria for implantation in this population. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify all studies that explored ICD therapies and associated clinical characteristics in patients with an sRV and primary prevention ICD from the inception of the databases until February 14, 2023. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in the final analysis. Among those with a primary prevention ICD, 23 (9.1%) had appropriate ICD therapies and 48 (19%) received inappropriate ICD therapies. Among those with appropriate ICD therapies, the most common reason for implantation was sRV dysfunction, followed by nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia on a Holter monitor. Among those with a secondary prevention ICD, 15 (34.9%) received appropriate ICD therapies and 5 (11%) had inappropriate ICD therapies. Most inappropriate therapies were due to atrial tachyarrhythmias. Conclusions: sRV dysfunction was the most consistently reported risk factor for appropriate ICD therapy in our review. Effective treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias remains a priority. Larger scale studies are required to develop and validate risk calculation in this population.

Identifiers

PMID41608362
PMCPMC12835910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.