ArticlemicroLife2026
Comprehensive analysis of CRISPR array repeat mutations reveals subtype-specific patterns and links to spacer dynamics.
Article in microLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-enabled functional genomics for bolstering plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress; a comprehensive review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A leader-repeat hairpin blocks extraneous CRISPR RNA production in diverse CRISPR-Cas13 systems.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- The complexity of multiple CRISPR arrays in strains with (co-occurring) CRISPR systems.microLife · 2026Article
- Article
- An evolutionary approach to predict the orientation of CRISPR arrays.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and their associated CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems are adaptive immune mechanisms in bacteria and archaea that protect against invading genetic elements by integrating short fragments of foreign DNA into CRISPR arrays. These arrays consist of repetitive sequences interspersed with unique spacers, guiding Cas proteins to recognize and degrade matching nucleic acids. The integrity of these repeat sequences is crucial for the proper function of CRISPR-Cas systems, yet their mutational dynamics remain poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed 56 343 CRISPR arrays across 25 628 diverse prokaryotic genomes to assess the mutation patterns in CRISPR array repeat sequences within and across different CRISPR subtypes. Our findings reveal, as expected to some extent, that mutation frequency is substantially higher in terminal repeat sequences compared to internal repeats consistently across system types. However, the mutation patterns exhibit an unexpected amount of variation among different CRISPR subtypes, suggesting that selective pressures and functional constraints shape repeat sequence evolution in distinct ways. Understanding these mutation dynamics provides insights into the stability and adaptability of CRISPR arrays across diverse bacterial and archaeal lineages. Additionally, we elucidate a novel relationship between repeat mutations and spacer dynamics, demonstrating that hotspots for terminal repeat mutations coincide with regions exhibiting higher spacer conservation. This observation corroborates recent findings indicating that spacer deletions occur at a frequency 374 times greater than that of mutations and are significantly influenced by repeat misalignment. Our findings suggest that repeat mutations might play a pivotal role in spacer retention or loss, or vice versa, thereby highlighting an evolutionary trade-off between the stability and adaptability of CRISPR arrays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.