Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608222›Full record

ReviewJuntendo medical journal2025

Endotoxin Hemoperfusion as an Adjuvant Therapy for Sepsis: Lessons from the TIGRIS Trial.

Yu-Chang Yeh, Kunihiko Nagakari, Toshiaki Iba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Juntendo medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu-Chang Yeh
Kunihiko Nagakari
Toshiaki Iba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in antimicrobial therapy and supportive intensive care, mortality in septic shock remains unacceptably high. Hemoadsorption therapies have emerged as adjunctive strategies designed to remove circulating mediators that propagate the dysregulated host response. Among these, polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) represents the most extensively studied extracorporeal modality, specifically targeting circulating endotoxin. Over three decades of investigation have produced a complex body of evidence, ranging from early promising results in small, open-label studies to large randomized trials with inconsistent outcomes. Recent findings from the TIGRIS trial, employing Bayesian design and biomarker-guided patient selection, provide compelling support for a survival benefit in a well-defined subgroup of septic shock patients with intermediate endotoxin activity. This review synthesizes the evolution of PMX-HP research, from EUPHAS through EUPHRATES and TIGRIS, highlighting lessons learned in trial design, biomarker utilization, and patient stratification. These experiences underscore the potential of precision-based extracorporeal interventions in sepsis while outlining the critical methodological and regulatory challenges that remain.

Indexed as

organ dysfunctionpolymyxin Brandomized controlled trialsepsisshock

Identifiers

PMID41608222
PMCPMC12835429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.