ReviewJuntendo medical journal2025
Endotoxin Hemoperfusion as an Adjuvant Therapy for Sepsis: Lessons from the TIGRIS Trial.
Review in Juntendo medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision medicine in sepsis: lessons from the TIGRIS trial and the reawakening of targeted therapy.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Endotoxin Activity Assay-guided Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion: From Failed Trials to Biological Enrichment.Juntendo medical journal · 2026Review
- Granulomonocytapheresis for Sepsis: Mechanistic Rationale, Therapeutic Potential, and Potential Concerns in Thromboinflammatory Critical Illness.Juntendo medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advances in antimicrobial therapy and supportive intensive care, mortality in septic shock remains unacceptably high. Hemoadsorption therapies have emerged as adjunctive strategies designed to remove circulating mediators that propagate the dysregulated host response. Among these, polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) represents the most extensively studied extracorporeal modality, specifically targeting circulating endotoxin. Over three decades of investigation have produced a complex body of evidence, ranging from early promising results in small, open-label studies to large randomized trials with inconsistent outcomes. Recent findings from the TIGRIS trial, employing Bayesian design and biomarker-guided patient selection, provide compelling support for a survival benefit in a well-defined subgroup of septic shock patients with intermediate endotoxin activity. This review synthesizes the evolution of PMX-HP research, from EUPHAS through EUPHRATES and TIGRIS, highlighting lessons learned in trial design, biomarker utilization, and patient stratification. These experiences underscore the potential of precision-based extracorporeal interventions in sepsis while outlining the critical methodological and regulatory challenges that remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.