ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Detection of Acromegaly From Facial Images Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Clinical Experts.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pituitary surgery: the path to clinical solutions.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Detection of Acromegaly From Facial Images Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Clinical Experts.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Substantial diagnostic delay in acromegaly contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Screening attempts in high-risk groups have yielded few positive cases, underscoring the need for simple and precise prescreening methods. Objective: Machine-learning analysis of facial images shows promise for acromegaly detection but requires validation in larger, well-characterized cohorts using robust machine-learning frameworks as performed in this study. Methods: Facial images from different angles were collected via smartphone from 155 acromegaly patients (79% biochemically controlled) and 153 matched controls at all Swedish university hospitals. Six machine-learning models were trained to distinguish acromegaly from control images, including 3 deep neural networks pretrained on diverse image datasets (ImageNet models: ResNet50, InceptionV2, and DenseNet121) and 1 network pretrained specifically on facial images (FaRL). Model performance was compared to assessment by 12 experienced endocrinologists. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the FaRL-based model was superior to all ImageNet models and matched the accuracy of human experts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.89 for both) with similar specificity (0.87 vs 0.93) but higher sensitivity (0.82 vs 0.66). Classification agreement between the best machine-learning model (FaRL) and human experts was 86% for true negatives and 60% for true positives. Machine-learning models and human experts both showed greater sensitivity in identifying acromegaly in male patients. Conclusion: A deep learning model pretrained on facial features (FaRL) can detect acromegaly from standard photographs with accuracy comparable to that of expert endocrinologists. This supports the feasibility of face analysis as a screening tool for acromegaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.