Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41608201›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026

Detection of Acromegaly From Facial Images Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Clinical Experts.

Konstantina Vouzouneraki, Erik Ylipää, Tommy Olsson, Katarina Berinder, Charlotte Höybye, Maria Petersson, Sophie Bensing, Anna-Karin Åkerman, Henrik Borg, Bertil Ekman and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Konstantina VouzounerakiDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-6763
Erik YlipääDepartment of Science and Technology, AIDA Data Hub, Linköping University, Linköping SE-58185, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-1552
Tommy OlssonDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-1076
Katarina BerinderDepartment of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-0375
Charlotte HöybyeDepartment of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3980-1927
Maria PeterssonDepartment of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-8593
Sophie BensingDepartment of Endocrinology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 76, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-2860
Anna-Karin ÅkermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Örebro University Hospital and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro SE-701 82, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-7695
Henrik BorgDepartment of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö SE-205 02, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-5557
Bertil EkmanDepartments of Endocrinology in Linköping and Norrköping and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University  Linköping SE-58185, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-7361
Jonas RobértDepartments of Endocrinology in Linköping and Norrköping and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University  Linköping SE-58185, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3598-4155
Britt Edén EngströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Endocrinology and Mineral Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala SE-751 85, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4514-5193
Oskar RagnarssonDepartment of Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg SE-413 45, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-9492
Pia BurmanDepartment of Endocrinology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö SE-205 02, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-8336
Per DahlqvistDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå SE-901 87, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-9503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Substantial diagnostic delay in acromegaly contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Screening attempts in high-risk groups have yielded few positive cases, underscoring the need for simple and precise prescreening methods. Objective: Machine-learning analysis of facial images shows promise for acromegaly detection but requires validation in larger, well-characterized cohorts using robust machine-learning frameworks as performed in this study. Methods: Facial images from different angles were collected via smartphone from 155 acromegaly patients (79% biochemically controlled) and 153 matched controls at all Swedish university hospitals. Six machine-learning models were trained to distinguish acromegaly from control images, including 3 deep neural networks pretrained on diverse image datasets (ImageNet models: ResNet50, InceptionV2, and DenseNet121) and 1 network pretrained specifically on facial images (FaRL). Model performance was compared to assessment by 12 experienced endocrinologists. Results: The diagnostic accuracy of the FaRL-based model was superior to all ImageNet models and matched the accuracy of human experts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.89 for both) with similar specificity (0.87 vs 0.93) but higher sensitivity (0.82 vs 0.66). Classification agreement between the best machine-learning model (FaRL) and human experts was 86% for true negatives and 60% for true positives. Machine-learning models and human experts both showed greater sensitivity in identifying acromegaly in male patients. Conclusion: A deep learning model pretrained on facial features (FaRL) can detect acromegaly from standard photographs with accuracy comparable to that of expert endocrinologists. This supports the feasibility of face analysis as a screening tool for acromegaly.

Indexed as

acromegalydeep learningdiagnostic delayface classificationface photographsmachine learningscreening

Identifiers

PMID41608201
PMCPMC12838525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.